Thursday, November 05, 2026
Hang Some of Those Politicians!
“It is the mark of our whole modern history that the masses are kept quiet with a fight. They are kept quiet by the fight because it is a sham-fight; thus most of us know by this time that the Party System has been popular only in the sense that a football match is popular.” - G. K. Chesterton
We just finished an election here in the United States. Well, almost finished. With slow coun ting, odd systems, and possible lawsuits the final results might not be clear for days, or weeks.
The campaign was full of false claims, insults, personality clashes, and lots of passion. Like a football match indeed.
In the U.S., the two main parties are the Democrats and the Republicans. If Chesterton was with us in the flesh, I suspect he would not belong to either of them. The Democrats have strayed so far from reality on a number of moral and common-sense issues they are in danger of exploding. And the Republicans are dutifully following their lead.
Chesterton did at one point flirt with politics, but reason prevailed and while he commented on political winds and nonsense, he remained apart from them. And he was very clear about his rejections of socialism and communism - with which the Democrats are playing these days.
There is only one political party around now that Chesterton might have at least appreciated: The American Solidarity Party.
The ASP has a platform that very much aligns with Catholic social teaching on multiple issues. And the party embraces a form of distributism. Indeed, the party's platform plank on Corporate and Monetary Policy declares:
The American Solidarity Party believes that political economy is a branch of political ethics, and therefore rejects models of economic behavior that undermine human dignity with greed and naked self-interest. We advocate for an economic system which liberates people from being cogs in a pitiless machine, instead creating a society of widespread ownership, or distributism.
The plank goes on to say:
We believe the American economy should be reordered to place human dignity first and to recognize that the family is the basic unit of economic production. We are committed to policies that emphasize local production, family-owned businesses, and cooperative ownership structures.
Policy should encourage and incentivize families who run their own small businesses and help them to provide just wages to their workers. Government policy must not favor large corporations, help them to outcompete small businesses, or encourage administrative bloat.
One can imagine Chesterton applauding enthusiastically.
I could go on.
I believe the ASP has been represented at at least one a past Chesterton conference. I don't know if that connection has continued.
Indeed, I don't know what future the party has. They have run Presidential candidates, each time getting more votes. And some people have run for state and local offices as a member of the party (including me). I don't know if any of them won (I didn't).
It's something to watch, though, as our two main parties continue their downward spiral and ultimatley fail to improve the lives of so many. As Chesterton noted:
“The whole modern world has divided itself into Conservatives and Progressives. The business of Progressives is to go on making mistakes. The business of the Conservatives is to prevent the mistakes from being corrected.”
He is right that government in an "ugly necessity,"
However, he may also be right when he says, “It is terrible to contemplate how few politicians are hanged.”
Friday, October 30, 2026
And Reading "Friends"
Last week I listed some of the Chesterton works I've read. I think I caught them all.
Now for the "Friends."The Children’s Crusade by Frances Chesterton
Sir Cleges by Frances Chesterton
Piers Plowman’s Pilgrimage by Frances Chesterton
(Special mention of a book about her - The Woman Who Was Chesterton by Nancy Carpentier Brown)
Hilaire Belloc was his good friend in life. I have not read as much of him as I should:
The Path to Rome by Hilaire Belloc
Hilaire Belloc’s Cautionary Verses
He also associated with Dorothy Sayers when it came to mysteries:
Whose Body? by Dorothy L. Sayers
Clouds of Witness by Dorothy L. Sayers
The Unpleasantness at the Bellona Club by Dorothy Sayers
Unnatural Death by Dorothy Sayers
Have His Carcase by Dorothy Sayers
Gaudy Night by Dorothy L. Sayers
Strong Poison by Dorothy L. Sayers
Busman’s Honeymoon by Dorothy L. Sayers
The Five Red Herrings by Dorothy Sayers
Murder Must Advertise by Dorothy Sayers
The Nine Tailors by Dorothy Sayers
Then there are those who were influenced by him:
Til We Have Faces by C. S, Lewis
A Grief Observed by C. S. Lewis
Surprised by Joy by C. S. Lewis
The Pilgrim’s Regress by C. S. Lewis
The Weight of Glory by C. S. Lewis
The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe by C. S. Lewis
Prince Caspian by C. S. Lewis
The Voyage of the Dawn Treader by C. S. Lewis
The Silver Chair by C. S. Lewis
The Horse and His Boy by C. S. Lewis
The Magician’s Nephew by C. S. Lewis
The Last Battle by C. S. Lewis
Out of the Silent Planet by C. S. Lewis
Perlandra by C. S. Lewis
That Hideous Strength by C. S. Lewis
The Screwtape Letters (and Screwtape Proposes a Toast) by C.S. Lewis
Mere Christianity by C. S. Lewis
The Great Divorce by C. S. Lewis
The Father Christmas Letters by J.R.R. Tolkien
The Adventures of Tom Bombadil by J.R.R. Tolkien
The Return of the King by J.R.R. Tolkien
The Two Towers by J.R.R Tolkien
The Fellowship of the Ring by J.R.R. Tolkien
The Hobbit by J. R. R. Tolkien
And plenty of folks writing about Chesterton or promoting him and his friends.
The Complete Thinker: The Marvelous Mind of G. K. Chesterton by Dale Ahlquist
All Roads by Dale Ahlquist
Knight of the Holy Ghost by Dale Ahlquist
My Name is Lazarus edited by Dale Ahlquist
The Gift of Wonder: The Many Sides of G. K. Chesterton edited by Dale Ahlquist
G. K. Chesterton: A Biography by Ian Ker
Heroes of the Catholic Reformation: Saints Who Renewed the Church by Joseph Pearce
Faith of our Fathers: A History of True England by Joseph Pearce
C. S. Lewis and the Catholic Church by Joseph Pearce
Literature: What Every Catholic Should Know by Joseph Pearce
Beauteous Truth: Faith, Reason, Literature and Culture by Joseph Pearce
Divining Divinity (poems) by Joseph Pearce
Wisdom and Innocence: A Biography of G. K. Chesterton by Joseph Pearce
Gilbert Keith Chesterton by Maisie Ward
Now back to our regularly scheduled posting.
Thursday, October 22, 2026
Books Read: Chesterton
Wow.
I'm an obsessive sort, so I thought I'd check how many books I'd read. I started keeping count in 2013, but I also had a blog before that, and some journals. Digging though all that, I came up with 869 books. I'm currently averaging 60-70 books a year. He averaged about 60 a year.
If I'd kept a tally for 61 years like him and read at the rate that I am currently, I might have been able to come close to his total. Alas, late start. And while I was working, I read fewer books - in part because as a teacher I was reading the same books over and over each year. How many times did I reread To Kill a Mockingbird, Jane Eyre, The Scarlet Letter, Romeo and Juliet, and so on as I was teaching them? If I counted each rereading that could easily add 40-50 to my tally. But I don't count them, and even if I did, it would not be enough.
If I keep up my current rate, I'll have more than 2,000 books read by the time I reach his age.
Not even close to his remarkable total.
Among those works I've read are many by Chesterton. Here's what I have on that list from Chesterton so far:
The Coloured Lands by G. K. Chesterton
G. K. Chesterton’s Early Poetry
Lepanto: With Explanatory Notes and Commentary by G. K. Chesterton
The Ballad of the White Horse by G.K. Chesterton
St. Thomas Aquinas: The Dumb Ox by G. K. Chesterton
St. Francis of Assisi by G. K. Chesterton
Heretics by G. K. Chesterton
Orthodoxy by G. K. Chesterton
The Everlasting Man by G. K. Chesterton
Autobiography by G. K. Chesterton
In Defense of Sanity: The Best Essays of G. K. Chesterton
Tremendous Trifles by G. K. Chesterton
Chesterton in Black and White
Manalive by G.K. Chesterton
The Poet and the Lunatics by G. K. Chesterton
The Man Who Was Thursday by G. K. Chesterton
The Napoleon of Notting Hill by G. K. Chesterton
The Club of Queer Trades by G. K. Chesterton
The Flying Inn by G.K. Chesterton
The Ball and the Cross by G. K. Chesterton
The Incredulity of Father Brown by G. K. Chesterton
The Wisdom of Father Brown by G. K. Chesterton
The Secret of Father Brown by G.K. Chesterton
The Innocence of Father Brown by G. K, Chesterton
The Scandal of Father Brown by G. K. by some of his "friends" Chesterton -
“The Donnington Affair” by G. K. Chesterton
“The Vampire of the Village” by G. K. Chesterton
“The Mask of Midas” by G. K. Chesterton
Magic by G. K. Chesterton
"The Turkey and the Turk" by G. K. Chesterton
"What You Won’t" by G. K. Chesterton
The Surprise by G. K. Chesterton
The Judgement of Dr. Johnson by G. K. Chesterton
There are parts of other books I've read - essays mostly. But I didn't count them as I hadn't read all of the books.
Then there are books about Chesterton I've read, and books by some of his "friends" - Belloc, Sayers, Lewis, Tolkien, Williams - but that's for another post.
Thursday, October 15, 2026
A Reading Goal Met
Each year I set reading goals. I have an overall goal based on number of works and pages - this year 60-70 works and 15,000 pages.
I also set specific goals about genres and particular writers. One of those writers each year is G. K. Chesterton. I had two goals related to him: a book about him, and a book by him that I had not previously read.
Earlier this year I read The Gift of Wonder: The Many Sides of G. K. Chesterton edited by Dale Ahlquist, meeting the first goal. In the last week, I finished The Club of Queer Trades, meeting the second Chesterton goal.
It was an early effort on his part - 1905. And it seemed to be making fun of detective fiction. The "detective" in this case, Rupert Grant, keeps getting things wrong. Meanwhile his brother, the retired judge Basil Grant, solves the puzzles, always ending up with no crime being committed!
I had the sense that Basil was Chesterton projecting himself into the story. Hmm.
The title is based on a club where the members come up with odd and original trades that provide them with a living.
There is plenty of Chestertonian humor in the characters. I think he was having fun.
I enjoyed it. I was considering several of his books to read, and I'm glad I chose this one.
By the way, among my other individual reading goals, ones that I also met:
The Adventures of Tom Bombadil by J. R. R. Tolkien
A book by C. S. Lewis, possibly a reread - The Weight of Glory
A book by Charles Dickens I have not yet read - Our Mutual Friend
A book by Dostoevsky - The Possessed
Indeed, I have met all of my specific goals, with The Club of Queer Trades being the last one met.
All have left are my overall goals, and I am on my way to meeting them. I'm up to 56 works, so 60 - 70 is well within reach. And my page count is up to 13,141 - so I just have about 2,000 pages to go.
Thursday, October 08, 2026
Oh, That Don Juan
October 7 was the anniversary of the Battle of Lepanto, which took place on October 7, 1571. The fleet of the Holy League, under the command Don Juan of Austria, the illegitimate son of Holy Roman Emperor Charles V, defeated a larger, more powerful Turkish fleet. The Christians credited the praying of the Rosary for the victory - hence October 7 is now celebrated as the Feast of Our lady of the Rosary. Meanwhile, Don Juan was lauded as a hero.
G. K. Chesterton wrote his most famous, and one of this best. poems about the victory, "Lepanto." In the poem he referred to Don Juan - in the poem, "Don John" repeatedly, calling him "the last knight of Europe."
"Don John of Austria is going to the war."
That particular line is repeated a copuple of times later in the poem.
Chesterton also says at later points:
"Don John of Austria/Is riding to the sea."
And
"Don John of Austria/Is gone by Alcalar."
And
"Don John of Austria is girt and going forth."
And so on.
Okay, Don Juan was the hero of the battle, and the poem. But what happened to him after the battle.
It's unclear all that he was up to at first, he captured Tunis in 1573, for example, but it was retaken by the Ottoman Empire a year later. In 1576, he was named governor-general of the Spanish Netherlands, part of which were in rebellion against Spanish rule, in part because they had become Protestant and did not want to be controlled by a Catholic ruler. In 1577, Don Juan led the forced that captured Namur, and in 1878 won the Battle of Gembloux, but on July 31, 1578, he was defeated at the battle of Rijmenam. He retreated, and before he could pursue further action, got sick and died October 1, 1578. He was just 31.
In addition to his fighting, Don Juan also engaged in some activities that make him less than a Catholic hero. Prior to the battle he had fathered an illegitimate daughter by one woman, and after the battle, another illegitimate daughter born in 1573 to a different woman - who was just 17 - and an illegitimate son in 1574 by yet another woman. At the time of his death, he was in a "relationship" with still another woman.
Chesterton did not dwell on this part of "Don John's" life. Or even allude to it.
The poem ends simply:
"But Don John of Austria rides home from the Crusade."
Thursday, October 01, 2026
St. Francis
Back in the mid 1970s I was struggling with my faith. Three books helped to right my spiritual ship: The Seven Storey Mountain by Thomas Merton, The Confessions St. Augustine, and St. Francis of Assisi by G. K. Chesterton.
Chesterton's book about St. Francis is considered one of the best biographies of the saint. It certainly was inspiring to me.
I'd known a little about St. Francis before reading the book. I grew up near a Franciscan monastery. I'd seen the 1961 movie about him. But reading Chesterton's book pushed me to learn more, and St. Francis has been pivotal to my life since. I've now read multiple books about him and seen several movies about him. Fifteen years ago, I even professed as a Secular Franciscan.
This year marks the 800th anniversary of St. Francis' transitus - his transition from earthly life to life in heaven with God - which took place October 3, 1226. Franciscans around the world will be celebrating that anniversary.
In 1980, I was inspired to write a poem about St. Francis.
San Damiano"One day in the church of St.
Damian, he (St. Francis) hears
words spoken from the Crucifix:
'Go, Francis, and repair my
house; as you can see, it is
falling into ruin.''
--- Fr. Stanislaus Majarelli, OFM
The roses are in bloom at San Damiano.
Their scent bleeds into the air,
flows down from the hills,
floods the streets of Assisi
like the beggars who cry,
``Bread and stones,
bread and stones.''
In the shadowy cafe,
men sit
hearing to the calls.
One man spits and mutters a curse.
Another man begins a bawdy song
that pours out
into the darkening air.
At midnight: silence.
Fog shrouds the streets
and snakes into the hills.
The hills rise above the fog
like islands in a dead sea.
And taller still
rises
San Damiano's half-built steeple
reaching toward
Thursday, September 24, 2026
Blessed Fulton Sheen and Chesterton
"The greatest influence in writing was G. K. Chesterton who never used a useless word, who saw the value of a paradox, and avoided what was trite." - Fulton J. Sheen
Today, Blessed Fulton J. Sheen was officially beatified.
I wrote something earlier this year about Blessed Sheen and Chesterton, a writer whom Sheen admired. The two even met, Chesterton wrote a preface to one of Sheen's books, and Sheen attended Chesterton's funeral in 1936.
Here's part of what I wrote earlier -
I was reminded of something Dale Ahlquist wrote a couple of years ago:
In addition to being a radio and television personality, Sheen was a popular author. He wrote over 30 books that were bestsellers. But his first book is less well-known. It was his doctoral thesis. He had the bright idea that it would be more attractive to a publisher if it had an introduction by a famous writer. Like G.K. Chesterton. Sheen recalled the encounter:
My first meeting was when I asked him to write the preface to my book God and Intelligence. Chesterton said, “I know nothing about Philosophy.” I retorted that he had written an excellent philosophy himself entitled Orthodoxy. Scratching his bushy head, he said, “I will write it! We both belong to the great mystical corporation called the Catholic Church in which we stand responsible for one another’s opinions. You know what I must believe, and I know what you must believe.”
The last meeting was in 1936, when Monsignor Sheen traveled from Catholic University to Beaconsfield, England, to attend Chesterton’s funeral.
One day a woman called me up because she wanted to tell me about the time she met Bishop Sheen. She had been a librarian at a university and Sheen was visiting. He was at the height of his popularity. He was being escorted through the library by university officials and one of them introduced her to the bishop by saying that she had read all of Sheen’s books. The bishop smiled and asked her: “But who’s your favorite author?”
She didn’t hesitate: “G.K. Chesterton.”
Sheen smiled even bigger. “Mine, too!”
Sheen said that the writer who influenced him the most was G.K. Chesterton. It is obvious to anyone who reads Sheen. In fact, many of those great Sheen lines are actually lines from GKC, such as: “We don’t need a Church that moves with the world, we need a Church that moves the world.”
But talk about moving with the world …
Maybe someday we will be able to celebrate Blessed Gilbert Chesterton too!
Thursday, September 17, 2026
Humour
“Humor can get in under the door while seriousness is still fumbling at the handle.” - G. K. Chesterton
There is so much darkness in our world these days that it would be easy to despair. But there is also so much good. We have a choice on which to focus.
Chesterton clearly opted for the good in his time. One manifestation of it is his good humor.
"The comedy of man survives the tragedy of man." - G. K. Chesterton
Laughter helps us to deal with the darkness. It gives us hope and turns us out from ourselves. It helps us to focus on what is true and beautiful and good.
It would be possible to go on quoting him again and again. But her also wrote an essay in 1928 about "humour" - and that seems appropriate to post here.
Humour, in the modern use of the term, signifies a perception of the comic or incongruous of a special sort; generally distinguished from Wit, as being on the one side more subtle, or on the other side more vague. It is thus a term which not only refuses to be defined, but in a sense boasts of being indefinable; and it would commonly be regarded as a deficiency in humour to search for a definition of humour. The modern use of the term, however, is by no means the primary or necessary use of it; and it is one of the cases, rarer than is commonly supposed, in which derivation offers at least an approach to definition. Everybody knows that `Humor’, in the Latin sense of `moisture’ was applied here as part of the old physiological theory, by which the characters of men varied according to the proportions of certain different secretions in the human body; as, for instance, that the predominance of phlegm produced the phlegmatic humour. By the time of the full consolidation of the English language, it had thus become possible for Ben Jonson and others to use the word `humour’ rather in the sense of `the ruling passion’. With this there necessarily went an idea of exaggeration; and by the end of the process the character of a humorist was more or less identical with what we should call an eccentric. The next stages of the development, which are rather slow and subtle correspond to the various degrees in which the eccentric has become conscious of his eccentricity. England has always been especially rich in these eccentrics; and in England, where everything was less logical and more casual than in other countries, the eccentric long remained, as we should say, half unconsciously and half consciously humorous. The blend, and the beginnings of the modern meaning, may perhaps be dated at about the time of Walter Scott’s Waverley Novels; when Guy Mannering complains of Councillor Pleydell as `a crack-brained humorist’. For Pleydell is indeed laughed at for his little vanities or whims; but he himself joins in the laugh and sees the humour of his humour. Since then the word has come to be used more and more exclusively of conscious humour; and generally of a rather deep and delicate appreciation of the absurdities of others.
Nevertheless there clings to the word Humour, especially when balanced against the word Wit, a sort of tradition or atmosphere that belongs to the old eccentrics whose eccentricity was always wilful and not infrequently blind. The distinction is a fine one; but one of the elements remaining in this blend is a certain sense of being laughed at, as well as of laughing. It involves some confession of human weakness; whereas wit is rather the human intellect exerting its full strength, though perhaps upon a small point. Wit is reason on its judgment seat; and though the offenders may be touched lightly, the point is that the judge is not touched at all. But humour always has in it some idea of the humorist himself being at a disadvantage and caught in the entanglements and contradictions of human life. It is a grave error to underrate Wit as something trivial; for certain purposes of satire it can truly be the sword of the spirit, and the satirist bears not the sword in vain. But it is essential to wit that he should bear the sword with ease; that for the wit the weapon should be light if the blow be heavy; that there should be no question of his being encumbered with his instrument or laying open his guard. But humour can be of the finest and yet lay open the guard or confess its inconsistency. When Voltaire said, commenting on the judicial murder of Byng, “In England they kill one Admiral to encourage the others,” it would immediately be recognized as humour. But we rightly class Voltaire as a wit, because he represents the consistent human reason detesting an inconsistency. We shall be very wrong if we despise him as a wit, for that French clearness has depths of irony; there is, for instance, more than is seen at a glance in the very word `encourage’. But it is true that the wit is here a judge independent of the judges, unaffected by the King or the Admiral or the English Courtmartial or the mob. He is abstract justice recording a contradiction. But when Falstaff (a model of the humorist become or becoming conscious) cries out in desperate bravado, “They hate us youth,” the incongruity between the speech and the corpulent old humbug of a speaker is present to his own mind, as well as to ours. He also discovers a contradiction, but it is in himself; for Falstaff really did bemuse himself with youthful companionship which he knew to be like a drug or a dream; and indeed Shakespeare himself, in one at least of the Sonnets, becomes bitterly conscious of the same illusion. There is therefore in humour, or at least in the origins of humour, something of this idea of the eccentric caught in the act of eccentricity and brazening it out; something of one surprised in disarray and become conscious of the chaos within. Wit corresponds to the divine virtue of justice, in so far as so dangerous a virtue can belong to man. Humour corresponds to the human virtue of humility and is only more divine because it has, for the moment, more sense of the mysteries.
If there be so much of enlightenment to be gathered from the history of the word, there is very little to be gathered from any of the attempts at a scientific history of the thing. The speculations on the nature of any reaction to the risible belong to the larger and more elementary subject of Laughter and are for the department of psychology; according to some, almost for that of physiology. Whatever be their value touching the primitive function of laughter, they throw very little light on the highly civilized product of humour. It may well be questioned whether some of the explanations are not too crude even for the crudest origins; that they hardly apply even to the savage and certainly do not apply to the child. It has been suggested, for example, that all laughter had its origin in a sort of cruelty, in an exultation over the pain or ignominy of an enemy; but it is very hard even for the most imaginative psychologist to believe that, when a baby bursts out laughing at the image of the cow jumping over the moon, he is really finding pleasure in the probability of the cow breaking her leg when she comes down again. The truth is that all these primitive and prehistoric origins are largely unknown and possibly unknowable; and like all the unknown and unknowable are a field for furious wars of religion. Such primary human causes will always be interpreted differently according to different philosophies of human life. Another philosophy would say, for instance, that laughter is due not to an animal cruelty but to a purely human realization of the contrast between man’s spiritual immensity within and his littleness and restriction without, for it is itself a joke that a house should be larger inside than out. According to such a view, the very incompatability between the sense of human dignity and the perpetual possibility of incidental indignities, produces the primary or archetypal joke of the old gentleman sitting down suddenly on the ice. We do not laugh thus when a tree or a rock tumbles down; because we do not know the sense of self-esteem or serious importance within. But such speculations in psychology, especially in primitive psychology, have very little to do with the actual history of comedy as an artistic creation.
There is no doubt that comedy existed as an artistic creation many thousands of years ago, in the case of peoples whose life and letters we can sufficiently understand to appreciate the fine shades of meaning; especially, of course, in the case of the Greeks. It is difficult for us to say how far it existed in civilizations more remote of which the records are for us more stiff and symbolic; but the very limitation of symbolism which makes it hard for us to prove its existence should warn us against assuming without evidence that it did not exist. We know more about Greek humour than about Hittite humour, at least partly for the simple reason that we know Greek better than we know any sort of colloquial Hittite; and while what applies to Hittite applies too in a less degree to Hebrew, a case like that of early Hebrew presents something of the same problem of limitation. But without any attempts to settle such problems of scholarship, it is hard to believe that the highest sense of human satire was not present in the words of Job. “Truly you are wise and wisdom will die with you”; or that no perception of a poetic contrast was felt by so great a poet when he said of Behemoth, commonly identified with the hippopotamus; “Canst thou play with him as with a bird?” It is probable that the Chinese civilization, in which the quality of the quaint and the fantastic has flowered with a beautiful luxuriance for many centuries, could also quote fairly early examples of the same order of fancy.
In any case, humour is in the very foundations of our European literature, which alone is quite sufficiently a part of ourselves for the full appreciation of so subtle and sometimes sub-conscious a quality. Even a schoolboy can see it in such scenes of Aristophanes as that in which the dead man sits up in indignation at having to pay the toll of the Styx, and says he would rather come to life again; or when Dionysus asks to see the wicked in hell and is answered by a gesture pointing at the audience. Before the period of intellectual controversies in Athens, indeed, we generally find in Greek poetry, as in the greater part of all human folk lore, that the joke is a practical joke. To a robust taste, however, it is none the less of a joke for that. For the joke of Odysseus calling himself Noman is not, as some suppose, a sort of trivial pun or verbalism; the joke is in the gigantic image of the raging Cyclops, roaring as if to rend the mountains, after being defeated by something so simple and so small. And this example is worth noting; as representing what is really the fun of all the fairy-tales; the notion of something apparently omnipotent made impotent by some tiny trick. This fairy-tale idea is undoubtedly one of the primitive fountains from which flows the long winding stream of historic humour. When Puss in Boots persuades the boastful magician to turn into a mouse and be eaten, it almost deserves to be called wit.
After these two early expressions, the practical joke of the folk-tale and the more philosophic fun of the Old Comedy, the history of humour is simply the history of literature. It is especially the history of European literature; for this sane sense of the incongruous is one of the highest qualities balancing the European spirit. It would be easy to go through the rich records of every nation and note this element in almost every novel or play, and in not a few poems or philosophical works. There is naturally no space for such a survey; but three great names, one English, one French and a third Spanish, may be mentioned for their historical quality; since they opened new epochs and even their few superiors were still their followers. The first of these determining names is that of Chaucer, whose urbanity has done something to conceal his real originality. Medieval civilization had a very powerful sense of the grotesque, as is apparent in its sculpture alone; but it was in a sense a fighting sentiment; it dealt with dragons and devils; it was alive, but it was very decidedly kicking. Chaucer brought into this atmosphere a cool air of true comedy; a sort of incongruity most incongruous in that world. In his personal sketches we have a new and very English element, of at once laughing at people and liking them. The whole of humorous fiction, if not the whole of fiction, dates from the Prologue of the Canterbury Tales. Rather later, Rabelais opened a new chapter by showing that intellectual things could be treated with the energy of high spirits and a sort of pressure of physical exuberance, which was itself humorous in its very human abandon. He will always be the inspiration of a certain sort of genial impatience; and the moments when the great human mind boils over like a pot. The Renaissance itself was, of course, such a boiling, but the elements were some of them more poisonous; though a word should be said for the tonics of that time, the humour of Erasmus and of More. Thirdly, there appeared with the great Cervantes an element new in its explicit expression; that grand and very Christian quality of the man who laughs at himself. Cervantes was himself more chivalrous than most men when he began to mock at chivalry. Since his time, humour in this purely humorous sense, the confession of complexity and weakness already remarked upon, has been a sort of secret of the high culture of the West. The influence of Cervantes and Rabelais, and the rest runs through all modern letters, especially our own; taking on a shrewd and acid tang in Swift, a more delicate and perhaps more dubious taste in Sterne, passing on through every sort of experiment of essay or comedy, pausing upon the pastoral gaiety of Goldsmith or going on finally to bring forth, like a great birth of giants, the walking caricatures of Dickens. Nor is it altogether a national accident that the tradition has here been followed in our own nation. For it is true that humour, in the special and even limited sense here given to it, humour as distinct from wit, from satire, from irony or from many things that may legitimately produce amusement, has been a thing strongly and specially present in English life and letters. That we may not in turn depreciate the wit and logic of the rest of the world, it will be well to remember that humour does originate in the half-conscious eccentric, that it is in part a confession of inconsistency, but, when all is said, it has added a new beauty to human life. It may even be noted that there has appeared especially in England a new variety of humour, more properly to be called Nonsense. Nonsense may be described as humour which has for the moment renounced all connection with wit. It is humour that abandons all attempt at intellectual justification; and does not merely jest at the incongruity of some accident or practical joke, as a by-product of real life, but extracts and enjoys it for its own sake. Jabberwocky is not a parody on anything; the Jumblies are not a satire on anybody; they are folly for folly’s sake on the same lines as art for art’s sake, or more properly beauty for beauty’s sake; and they do not serve any social purpose except perhaps the purpose of a holiday. Here again it will be well to remember that even the work of humour should not consist entirely of holidays. But this art of nonsense is a valuable contribution to culture; and it is very largely, or almost entirely, an English contribution. So cultivated and competent a foreign observer as M. Emile Cammaerts has remarked that it is so native as to be at first quite unmeaning to foreigners. This is perhaps the latest phase in the history of humour; but it will be well even in this case to preserve what is so essential a virtue of humour; the virtue of proportion. Humour, like wit, is related however indirectly, to truth and the eternal virtues; as it is the greatest incongruity of all to be serious about humour, so it is the worst sort of pomposity to be monotonously proud of humour; for it is itself the chief antidote to pride; and has been, ever since the time of the Book of Proverbs, the hammer of fools.
Thursday, September 10, 2026
Latest Clerihew Submissions
I submitted the following Clerihews to Gilbert. They are on top of a batch I sent in June. Will any of them make it to print? I don't know. The next issue will feature clerihews from the Chesterton Conference, so maybe in the issue after that I might see one of them published.
Calixto Garcia
was writing a love note to a pretty senorita
when Andrew Rowan burst into his life
with a message Garcia feared might be from his jealous wife.
Erasmus
rode into London on a double-decker bus.
He was looking for a novelty store
to buy a foolish gift for Thomas More.
Giacomo Puccini
was enjoying some fettuccini.
But he stopped mid-bite when a Japanese butterfly
caught his eye.
Heroic Colonel Patrick O'Rorke
and his wife had dreams about a visit from the stork.
Alas, at Gettysburg he was undone,
and his widow later became a nun.
Brigadier General Strong Vincent
tended to stand out whatever he did and wherever he went.
At Gettysburg he bid the world goodbye
when he stood out on a boulder and got shot in the thigh.
This last one is an old one, but since he's been in the news lately, I included it. If nothing else, it might give the Minnesota folks at Gilbert a chuckle.
was enjoying some spaghetti and meatballs,
but then got a sick feeling in his belly
when an ad for tampons came on the telly.
Thursday, September 03, 2026
Localism is Environmental
"The only words that ever satisfied me as describing nature are the terms used in fairy books, charm, spell, enchantment; they express the arbitrariness of the fact and its mystery." - G. K. Chesterton
The Season of Creation began September 1 and will run through October 4, the Feast of St. Francis of Assisi, the Patron Saint of Ecology.
A local parish celebrated the new Mass for Creation on September 1. The priest preached a homily about environmental concerns, and in the process made some comments that immediately made me think of Chesterton and localism.
Father decried large corporations, saying that they were concerned with profits, not with the effects their uni-crop/cash crop policies harm the environment. As part of that policy, they dose the land with chemical fertilizers that produce large crops in the short term but that damage the soil in the long run. He also said what is better is small, locally owned farms and business, as they encourage awareness of what is happening and care for the land, for the environment, and for their neighbors.
Very Chestertonian.
As Chesterton emphasized, small, local ownership, and concern for what is near and local is the way to go. We become more aware of what lies around us. As he noted, "One sees great things from the valley; only small things from the peak."
And, of course, Chesterton had respect for the natural world, seeing it as a source of wonder, and as a manifestation of the spiritual.
“Nature is not natural. Nature is supernatural.”I went up to the priest after Mass and asked if he was familiar with Chesterton and distributism/localism. He knew who Chesterton was, but did not seem to know a great deal about him. And it was clear he did not know anything about Chesterton's promotion of distributism.
Ah well, he at least he was thinking like Chesterton.
Thursday, August 27, 2026
Overlooked Dystopian Novels
I recently saw a list of best dystopian novels, with dystopian fiction defined as "a genre that explores imagined societies where life is deeply flawed, oppressive, or dehumanizing, often as a critique of current social, political, or technological trends."
Thursday, August 20, 2026
C. S. Lewis and "The Everlasting Man"
"As for books, the very best popular defense of the full Christian position I know is G.K. Chesterton’s The Everlasting Man." - C. S. Lewis
Last night my wife and I watched Shadowlands - the excellent Anthony Hopkins/Debra Winger version. The movie depicts the relationship of C.S. Lewis and Joy Davidman (taking some theatrical liberties) from their meeting to just after her death. Winger was nominated for an Academy Award for her portrayal.
In his autobiography, Surprised by Joy, Lewis talked about reading Chesterton.
That first encounter was with The Everlasting Man in 1925 while still an atheist.
Thursday, August 13, 2026
Chesterton and Dostoyevsky
“The one thing this Russian loves is Liberty. The one place where he finds it is in … no, not Christianity… Christ. Compared with that, he cares nothing for anything.” - G. K. Chesterton
I recently finished reading Fyodor Dostoyevsky's The Possessed (also called The Devils). It was one of my reading goals for this year. It also means I have now read all of Dostoyevsky's four great novels, the other three being The Brothers Karamazov, The Idiot, and Crime and Punishment. (I've also read Notes from the Underground.)
As I read it, I couldn't help thinking about the current socialist upsurge in the Democratic Party in the United States. His satire of the radicals/socialists in Russia could easily be applied to our progressives today.
I knew that Chesterton, like me, appreciated Dostoyevsky. He once wrote that Dostoyevsky "was one of the two or three greatest novelists of the nineteenth century. And he cared for nothing but Christ who had made him free. It is worth thinking about.”
I found a lecture that even dealt with Chesterton and Dostoyevsky.
https://youtu.be/2v2pEyoU8ps?si=pUfomTC4KZ4ymR0Y
Thursday, August 06, 2026
Nobel Committee Considered Tolkien Unworthy
In 1961, the Nobel Prize committee rejected J. R. R. Tolkien for the Literature Prize, deeming his work as unworthy.
The prize jury said his works had "not in any way measured up to storytelling of the highest quality".
Tolkien had been nominated for the prize by C. S. Lewis. The nomination had come after The Lord of the Rings trilogy had been published - The Return of the King, the last volume, came out in 1955. The committee said LOTR was “not comparable to works of the highest literary quality.”
He was nominated again in 1967 and 1969 after LOTR had developed a wider following - but he was rejected again.
Apparently, they did not like fantasy.
Ironically, by the end of the 20th Century and early in the 21st Century The Lord of the Rings topped many polls as the most significant or greatest book of the 20th Century.
Sunday, August 02, 2026
Six Catholic Authors
Some friends made the list!
6 great Christian authors (and how to start reading them) - Catholic Courier
Friday, July 31, 2026
Fauci Clerihew
In light of this "testimony" before Congress, and his later swearing at reporters, I scribbled:
Dr. Anthony Fauciis feeling a little grouchy.
He heeded what his lawyers said,
now his reputation and credibility are basically dead
Not great, lacks whimsy, but oh well...
Thursday, July 23, 2026
Death Is Part of the Adventure
One comment he made about the afterlife deals with the place we don't want to go.
Yes, we do have free will, and we can choose Hell; God does not send us there. The fact that it exists is indeed a compliment.
“A dead thing can go with the stream, but only a living thing can go against it.”
Death is passive; truly living involves struggling and facing the challenges of living.
Living is an adventure, and death is just part of it.
Thursday, July 16, 2026
A Message to Garcia
For several years I taught at a private Christian school. The school was run by a branch of the Plymouth Brethren that separated themselves as much as possible from the world, hence they created their own school to avoid their children being tainted by worldly education.
There are many tales I could tell about teaching there, but I'll stick to one that involves my sarcastic sense of humor and my big mouth.
The board overseeing the school consisted largely of businessmen. For a teacher conference one year they gave all the teachers in advance copies of A Message to Garcia by Elbert Hubbard. The book consisted of an 1899 essay that promoted initiative and conscientiousness in work. The essay is about the mission of Lieutenant Andrew Rowan to General Calixto Garcia in Cuba just before the Spanish-American War broke out.
Rowan was supposed just to make contact with Garcia and to serve as an observer, and there was actually no letter or message. Hubbard took extensive liberties with the actual story, using it as a means to show determination on the part of Rowan. He supposedly single-mindedly pursued his mission, overcoming obstacles, and never complaining. The essay became a best seller much loved by businessmen like those running our school.
On the day of the teacher conference the head of the board asked what we thought the message of the book was. Being a sarcastic sort, I replied, "Shut up and do your job."
They were not amused. Indeed, the principal chewed me out during a break.
After that incident, I did create one of my slugku (a humorous series of haiku that all begin with the line " a slug among weeds") about Hubbard's version of the story, and even added it to a picture of Rowan and Garcia.
I recently did a little more reading about the event, and about General Garcia. One thing I discovered was he was married, but had a series of mistresses and illegitimate children. I got inspired and wrote a clerihew.
was writing a love note to a pretty senorita
when Andrew Rowan burst into his life
with a message Garcia feared might be from his jealous wife.
Sometimes imagination is more amusing than just the facts. Hubbard certainly seemed to think that!
Thursday, July 09, 2026
Two Gettysburg Clerihews - With Connections
Last week was the 166th anniversary of the Battle of Gettysburg.
Okay, an oddly numbered anniversary, but my wife and I had once visited the site of the battle and have fond memories of that trip, and every year we rewatch the movie Gettysburg,
I have two other connections to Gettysburg, including a family one.
We live in Rochester, New York, and one of the heroes of the battle was from Rochester, Colonel Patrick O'Rorke.
An Irish immigrant, O'Rorke grew up in Rochester, where he encountered anti-Irish prejudice. He went to West Point, and after the Civil War saw action in multiple engagements. He rose through the ranks and by 1863 was the Colonel in command of the 140th New York Infantry Regiment, which consisted largely of Rochester-area volunteers and was mainly Irish.
When the Confederates were attacking Little Round Top on July 2, and after the heroics of Joshua Chamberlain's 20th Maine on the Union left flank, O'Rorke was ordered to take his regiment to the top of the hill to stop the continued the Rebel advance. He did so, and succeeded in repulsing them, but got shot and killed while urging his troop on. Although Chamberlain was later lauded as a hero of that phase of the three-day battle, historians view O'Rorke's actions as just as heroic and important.
Here in Rochester we have a bridge named after O Rorke.
His widow, Clara Bishop O'Rorke, later became a religious sister, a member of the Society of the Sacred Heart.
About him I wrote:
Heroic Colonel Patrick O'Rorkeand his wife had dreams about a visit from the stork.
Alas, at Gettysburg he was undone,
and his widow later became a nun.
My family connection to the battle is through Brigadier General Strong Vincent. His mother was Sarah Ann (Strong) Vincent, a granddaughter of Timothy Strong, who is my fourth-great-grandfather.
Strong Vincent was born in Waterford Pennsylvania. He had just begun a law practice when the Civil War began. He enlisted with the Pennsylvania Militia. He saw action in various battles and rose through the ranks, becoming by the time of the Battle of Gettysburg the Colonel commanding the 3rd Brigade - Chamberlain's 20th Maine was one of his regiments.
At the top of the hill, Vincent climbed on a boulder to urge his men on and was shot in the thigh. He died of his wound five days later, but in the interim in recognition of his heroism was promoted to Brigadier General.
Like O'Rorke, he left a young widow, Elizabeth Carter Vincent, though, in her case, she was pregnant. A daughter, Blanche, was born two months after the battle, but died before reaching the age of one. Elizabeth never married again.
In the movie, Gettysburg, Strong Vincent is portrayed by Maxwell Caulfield.
About Strong Vincent I wrote:
Brigadier General Strong Vincenttended to stand out whatever he did and wherever he went.
At Gettysburg he bid the world goodbye
when he stood out on a boulder and got shot in the thigh
Thursday, July 02, 2026
On the Library New Books Shelf
Thursday, June 25, 2026
Another Reading Goal Met
I begin every year by setting reading goals. Those goals include the total number of works read, the total number of pages, and specific book/genre/author goals. This year, one of those goals was to read a book about G. K. Chesterton. I met that goal last Sunday by finishing The Gift of Wonder: The Many Sides of G. K. Chesterton edited (of course) by Dale Ahlquist.
The book is a collection of papers presented at the June 2000 Chesterton Conference.
There are a number of delightful papers in the collection. As a Secular Franciscan, one that stood out for me was Frances Farrell's "Chesterton's St. Francis of Assisi." I also really enjoyed Aidan Mackey's "Chesterton and the Moral Imagination" and Ekaterina Volokhonskaia's "A Russian Perspective of G. K. Chesteron." And though I'm not a fan of Belloc (Heresy!), I also found James Reidy's "The Four Bellocs" interesting. (Yes, they snuck in a paper about Belloc in a book about Chesterton!)
Though I singled out a few of the papers, I enjoyed them all. Which is a nice way to meet one of my reading goals.
I had several other goals related to this blog.
I earlier in the year met one of them, reading The Adventures of Tom Bombadil by J. R. R. Tolkien.
I have two other blog-related goals to meet yet: A book by Chesterton, and a book by C. S. Lewis.
Friday, June 19, 2026
Chesterton and Fantasy/Science Fiction
Every Thursday at dinner time - except with it is preempted - we watch Chesterton Station on EWTN. The premise of the show is that Chesterton (wonderfully played by John Walker), after his death, is at a railway station where he meets up with others on their way to their eternal destinations. Robert Louis Stevenson, H. G. Wells, Georger Bernard Shaw, Charles Dickens, Dorothy Sayers, and George McDonald are among the travelers with whom he meets. They talk, act out scenes, interact with characters from their works, and enjoy some beverages. It's an amusing show, well worth watching.
Last night's episode featured Father Robert Hugh Benson, a convert who, in addition to being a priest, wrote works of fantasy and science fiction, the most famous of them being the dystopian novel Lord of the World.
Confession: I was in a play version of one of his novels, Come Rack! Come Rope!, about the persecution of Catholics in England under Queen Elizabeth.
In the episode, Father Benson is being harassed by forces of the "Lord of the World" - prompting Chesterton to fire off his pistol in their direction.
The episode got me to wondering what would have happened had Chesterton turned more of his energies to speculative fiction. He certainly wrote some fantastic tales, and two of his novels, The Man Who Was Thursday, and The Napoleon of Notting Hill, certainly seem to straddle the realms of fantasy and science fiction. And there are fantasy elements in the collection The Coloured Lands.
He might have produced more of such works, but I suspect his conversion changed his focus. He continued to write mysteries and essays - to help pay the bills - but seemed to focus more and more on religious writings.
I have not read all of his short fiction - yet - so perhaps there are some fantasy/science fiction gems among them. Perhaps some folks who have read him more widely have already looked into this.
Saturday, June 13, 2026
St. Clare Clerihew
Her symbolic rejection of worldly vanities
inspired some of her father's choicest profanities.
Thursday, June 04, 2026
Pope Leo Knows ...
In his first encyclical, Magnifica Humanitas, Pope Leo XIV, in talking about artificial intelligence and technology, cited J. R. R. Tolkien and The Lord of the Rings:
213. The twentieth-century Catholic author J.R.R. Tolkien, in the words of a protagonist in one of his novels, described our responsibility in this way: “It is not our part to master all the tides of the world, but to do what is in us for the succour of those years wherein we are set, uprooting the evil in the fields that we know, so that those who live after may have clean earth to till.” The civilization of love will not arise from a single or spectacular gesture, but from the sum total of small and steadfast acts of fidelity that serve as a bulwark against dehumanization. For this reason, it is worthwhile pausing to reflect on some aspects of how we, each in our own way, can cooperate in building the civilization of love. Without presuming to exhaust this theme, I would like to propose five paths toward daily and public responsibility: the need to disarm words, building peace through justice, adopting the perspective of victims, cultivating a healthy realism and reviving dialogue and multilateralism.There is a quote from the author Chesterton that can serve as a key to understanding everything I would like to share with you: “Take away the supernatural, and what remains is the unnatural” (cf. Heretics, VI). Man is not made to live closed in on himself, but in a living relationship with God. When that relationship is obscured or weakened, life begins to fall into disorder from within. The unnatural is not only the scandalous; it is enough to live without God in daily life, leaving him out of the criteria and decisions with which we face existence.
.
Thursday, May 28, 2026
People and Laws
“We do not need to get good laws to restrain bad people. We need to get good people to restrain us from bad laws." - G. K. Chesterton
One of the latest social outrages is the upsurge in "teen takeovers" in cities across the country. The out-of-control teens harass, commit vandalism, fight, assault bystanders and police, shoot people, and more.
Pundits and lawmakers are decrying the takeovers, and some are calling for new laws to help charge the teens, and even to charge their parents.
Laws to restrain.
Meanwhile, back in 2022, the State of New York, concerned about the environment, mandated that school districts replace their diesel school busses with "zero emission - i.e. electric - ones. The original mandate declared that after 2027 districts would no longer be able to buy diesel busses, and that by 2035 their bus fleets be entirely electric.
Some districts tried to comply. They quickly discovered that the electric busses were many times more expensive than diesel ones. That would inflate their budgets and would mean raising taxes. Meanwhile, rural districts discovered that the busses would not be able to cover all the long routes with a single charge, and that this got even worse in the cold winters which drained the batteries even more quickly to heat the busses. And as opponents of the plan in the first place had pointed out, New York's electric infrastructure is woefully inadequate to handle the new demand. The state is now trying to find new sources of electricity - including covering acres of fertile farmland with solar panels, hurting the state's agricultural industry.
Some communities have begun to rebel, voting down the purchase of the electric busses. The state's politicians, fearing voter backlash, have kicked the can down the road, moving the 2027 purchasing deadline to 2032, and the complete switchover from 2035 to 2040. Instead of revoking a bad law, they have simply delayed implementing it.
There are many other examples that illustrate Chesterton's observation, but these two will do.
With the teens, we are trying to restrain "bad people" with laws and more laws rather than addressing the underlying social issues that lead teens to act in these violent ways. We can ask "Where are the parents?", but they have abrogated or even are completely oblivious to their responsibilities, and, in many cases, are afflicted with the same social disorders and ignorance as their progeny. What we need are for parents and role models to be good people to provide proper examples and guidance.
As for the bus mandate, while dealing with a somewhat real concern - though one that seems to be blindly exaggerated (think of all the environmental "prophets" who predicted that the ice caps would all melt and parts of our coastal cities would now be under water) - they passed a law without thinking through its implications or even realistic chances of being implemented.
The lawmakers who shoved this mandate through did not heed the warnings of those good people with common sense who tried to restrain them.
Once again, Chesterton proves prophetic.
Thursday, May 21, 2026
Lepanto
'Don John of Austria
"That is from Lepanto, and it is a trumpet call! But indeed the whole of that poem Lepanto is not only the summit of Chesterton's achievement in verse but the summit of high rhetorical verse in all our generation. I have said this so often that I am almost tired of saying it again, but I must continue to say it. People who cannot see the value of Lepanto are half dead. Let them so remain."
~Hilaire Belloc: On the Place of Gilbert Chesterton in English Letters.
By G. K. Chesterton


